Post by xyz3000 on Feb 12, 2024 4:57:20 GMT
Carrefour will have to compensate public employee Anderson Moraes de Castro e Silva with R$3,000 for failing to secure the parking lot. The decision is from the 2nd Appeal Panel of the Special Civil Courts of Rio de Janeiro. According to the records, in December 2003 the consumer went to the Campo Grande store. After shopping, he returned to the parking lot and noticed that the CD player in his car had been stolen. The thieves also destroyed the car's control panel, glove compartment and air conditioning outlet. In court, Carrefour claimed that the blame should lie with the company hired to take care of the store's security. Judge Flávio Itabaiana Nicolau, from the 18th Special Court, did not accept the argument.
The commercial establishment that, in order to attract customers, provides a place for parking vehicles, even though it does not charge directly for this, assumes the obligation to guard and monitor them, becoming civilly responsible for any theft or damage”, he stated. The decision was upheld by the 2nd Appeal Panel of the Special Civil Courts of Rio de Janeiro.In this sequence, suppose that the Estonia Email List American currency has suffered an enormous appreciation due to an unpredictable and extraordinary government plan, causing excessive burden for one party and extreme advantage for the other. In this case, the only solution to be adopted by the judge in any legal action proposed by the debtor would be the termination of the contract, obliging the debtor to return the asset, and the creditor to refund the installments paid to date, deducting the necessary amount to reimburse the time the debtor used the car.
The object of both demands is the banking transactions that occurred between June 5 and 14, 1989, in a certain Safra bank account, in the city of Joinville (SC), which generated the contract for opening credit in a current account. In the analysis of the reporting minister, the counterclaim aims to invalidate all contracts made between June 5 and 14, 1989, based on alleged irregularities in banking operations carried out without Embraco's authorization and for the benefit of Distribank. Minister Cesar Rocha concluded that different terms were used in the actions, even though they had the same objects. For the minister, the legal qualifications are different one, the unenforceability of the obligation; the other, the nullity of contracts.
The commercial establishment that, in order to attract customers, provides a place for parking vehicles, even though it does not charge directly for this, assumes the obligation to guard and monitor them, becoming civilly responsible for any theft or damage”, he stated. The decision was upheld by the 2nd Appeal Panel of the Special Civil Courts of Rio de Janeiro.In this sequence, suppose that the Estonia Email List American currency has suffered an enormous appreciation due to an unpredictable and extraordinary government plan, causing excessive burden for one party and extreme advantage for the other. In this case, the only solution to be adopted by the judge in any legal action proposed by the debtor would be the termination of the contract, obliging the debtor to return the asset, and the creditor to refund the installments paid to date, deducting the necessary amount to reimburse the time the debtor used the car.
The object of both demands is the banking transactions that occurred between June 5 and 14, 1989, in a certain Safra bank account, in the city of Joinville (SC), which generated the contract for opening credit in a current account. In the analysis of the reporting minister, the counterclaim aims to invalidate all contracts made between June 5 and 14, 1989, based on alleged irregularities in banking operations carried out without Embraco's authorization and for the benefit of Distribank. Minister Cesar Rocha concluded that different terms were used in the actions, even though they had the same objects. For the minister, the legal qualifications are different one, the unenforceability of the obligation; the other, the nullity of contracts.